Polishing metals with laser radiation

Re-melting with laser radiation is a new method for the automated polishing of 3D surfaces in the tooling industry and medical engineering

Th 328771

by Edgar Willenborg and Roman Ostholt

Re-melting with laser radiation is a new method for the automated polishing of 3D surfaces in the tooling industry and medical engineering

The surface roughness of a part or product strongly influences its properties and functions including abrasion and corrosion resistance, tribological properties, and optical properties as well as the visual impression the customer desires. Therefore, in industrial manufacturing grinding and polishing techniques are widely used to reduce the roughness of surfaces. Based on large-area abrasion, automated polishing techniques—for example, electropolishing, electro-chemical polishing, or slide grinding—are predominantly processing edges and overhanging surfaces and lead to edge rounding. Furthermore deeper shafts are not processed. Therefore, current automated polishing techniques are often not applicable on parts with freeform surfaces and function-relevant edges. Thus, polishing in the tooling industry is mostly done manually.

Th 328771
FIGURE 1. Basic principle of polishing with laser radiation.
Click here to enlarge image

The quality of manual polishing strongly depends on the worker's skill and experience. Skilled workers are a scarce resource because manual polishing is demanding, monotonous work, and companies have problems recruiting suitable employees. Due to the low processing speed (typically in the range of 10 to 30min/cm²) and the sequential nature of the workflow, production of molds and dies with manual polishing is time consuming and cost intensive. For the manufacturing of injection and die casting molds 12 to 15 percent of the manufacturing costs1 and 30 to 50 percent of the manufacturing time2 is associated with polishing.

A new method for automated polishing of metals is polishing with laser radiation where a thin surface layer is melted with surface tension leading to material flow from the peaks to the valleys (see FIGURE 1). Material is not removed, rather it is relocated while molten. The laser beam is guided over the surface in contour-aligned patterns. A surface roughness of Ra ˜ 0.05 µm is achievable with laser polishing, depending on the material and the initial roughness. This surface quality is sufficient in a broad field of applications.

Th 328772
FIGURE 2. Laser polished tool steel.
Click here to enlarge image

The main characteristics and advantages of laser polishing are: a high level of automation which leads to short machining times especially in comparison to manual polishing; the ability to polish grained and micro-structured surfaces without damaging the structures; and small micro roughness as the surface results from the liquid phase. There is no pollution impact from grinding and polishing wastes and chemicals and there is no change in the form of the workpieces. Deviations of the desired form are not corrected but otherwise an already perfect form is not damaged.

Th 328773
FIGURE 3. TiAl6V4 surface milled (top) and micro polished (bottom).
Click here to enlarge image

When laser polishing metals, two sub-variants exist: macro and micro polishing. Macro polishing is carried out with CW laser radiation. Milled, turned, or EDM-processed surfaces with a roughness up to several micrometers can be polished as seen in FIGURE 2.3,4,5 Remelting depths between 20 to 200 µm are used. Beam diameter and remelting depth have to be chosen depending on the material and the initial surface roughness. Normally, fiber-coupled Nd:YAG lasers are used with laser powers of 70 to 300W. The processing time is between 10 and 200s/cm² depending on the initial surface roughness, the material, and the desired roughness after laser polishing. The achievable roughness depends on several influencing variables3. Segregations and inclusions can downgrade the surface quality. The best result achieved so far is the reduction of the roughness of a turned tool steel from Ra = 5.0 µm down to Ra = 0.05 µm.

In contrast to macro polishing, micro polishing is carried out with pulsed laser radiation.4, 6,7,8,9,10 The pulse duration normally is in the range of 20 to 1000 ns and the remelting depth in the range of 0.5 to 5 µm. With the micro polishing process variant, only fine pre-processed surfaces (e.g. ground, micro milled) can be polished. Due to the small remelting depth, larger surface structures remain unaffected and can, therefore, not be eliminated. The most important process parameters are pulse duration and intensity. Longer pulses can eliminate laterally larger surface structures. A top-hat intensity distribution is preferable to generate a homogenous remelting depth. Fiber-coupled Nd:YAG and excimer lasers are used. Processing times less than 3s/cm² are achievable. FIGURE 3 shows a TiAl6V4 surface before and after micro polishing. Due to the fine micro roughness, micro polishing is especially suitable for tribological and medical applications.

Th 328774
FIGURE 4. Technology specific CAM-NC process chain.11
Click here to enlarge image

The micro polishing process is limited to smooth surface structures with lateral dimensions of up to 20 to 100 µm depending on the material. Larger surface structures can only be removed with the macro polishing process. But, in contrast to the macro polishing process, the micro polishing process often leads to a finer micro roughness and, therefore, to a higher gloss. As a consequence, for some applications a combination of both variants is used: first macro polishing to eliminate the tracks from milling or turning, then micro polishing to enhance the gloss level.

Examples for polishing results are shown in the Table. Copper, gold, and aluminum alloys show hitherto predominately unsatisfying results, but otherwise laser polishing of these metals has not yet been investigated as closely as the polishing of steels and titanium alloys has.

Th 328779
FIGURE 5. Left: Mold half with freeform surface, left in the picture is the initial state, right in the picture is the laser polished. Right: glass form for the manufacturing of shafts and feet of wine glasses ground (left) and laser polished (front).
Click here to enlarge image

The main field of application for laser polishing is the substitution of the time and cost-consuming manual polishing, such as in tool and mold manufacturing or in medical engineering. The results shown in the Table are suitable for many applications but the task now is to achieve these results on complex shaped freeform surfaces.

Th 328778
Click here to enlarge image

For freeform applications a technology specific CAM-NC process chain for laser polishing is indispensable. The starting point for the CAM-NC process chain that is under development for laser polishing is a 3D CAD model of the workpiece11 shown in FIGURE 4. Using conventional CAM software for five-axis milling applications the tool paths are generated. The geometrical information of the tool paths are exported via the machine neutral APT (automatically programmed tools) interface in newly developed technology-specific post-processor software. This technology module comprises an application database which contains all necessary process parameters for laser polishing and carries out technology-specific corrective actions on the tool path necessary to gain good polishing results. In the final step of the CAM-NC process chain the data is exported in a machine-specific NC code and the workpiece is laser polished using an 8-axis laser polishing machine.

Examples for laser polished freeform surfaces are shown in FIGURE 5. The material of the mold in the left picture is GGG40 and the initial roughness is Ra=1.7µm. The required roughness of Ra<0.4µm is achieved in a processing time of less than 1min/cm². The material of the mold in the right picture is tool steel, the roughness after laser polishing is Ra<0.2µm. This mold is used for the manufacturing of shafts and stems of wine glasses.

The processing of 3D surfaces is still under investigation, but these examples show that laser polishing is applicable even for freeform surfaces. Laser-polished molds have been applied in production and have shown at least equal wear resistance properties in first sampling tests than manually polished molds.


  1. J. Antonana (President of ISTMA Europe), “European Tool and Mold Making,” Tagungsband “Werkzeugbau mit Zukunft,” Aachen, October 2002.
  2. J. P. Huissoon, F. Ismail, A. Jafari, S. Bedi, “Automated polishing of die steel surfaces,” Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2002, Band 19, S. 285-290.
  3. T. Kiedrowski, Oberflächenstrukturbildung beim Laserstrahlpolieren von Stahlwerkstoffen, to be published at the end of 2009.
  4. E. Willenborg, Polieren von Werkzeugstählen mit Laserstrahlung, Dissertation RWTH Aachen, Shaker Verlag Aachen 2006.
  5. J.A. Ramos, J. Murphy, K. Wood, D.L. Bourell, J.J. Beaman, “Surface roughness enhancement of indirect-SLS metal parts by laser surface polishing,” Konference-Einzelbericht: Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings, Proc.of the SFF Symp. 2001. S.28-38.
  6. Laser polishing of Nickel underplating, AMP Inc. October 2002, http//rf.rfglobalnet.com/library/applicationnotes/files/5/laser.htm.
  7. K.Richter, G. Barton, Verfahren zur Bearbeitung von durch Reibung hochbeanspruchten Flächen in Brennkraftmaschinen, Europäische Patentschrift EP 0 419 999 B1, 1990.
  8. H.W. Bergmann, H. Lindner, L. Zacherl, C. BrandensteinVerfahren zum Herstellen von Zylinderlaufbahnen von Hubkolbenmaschinen, Offenlegungsschrift DE 197 06 833 A 1, 1997.
  9. G.P. Singh, M. Suk, T.R. Albrecht, W.J. Kozlovsky, Laser smoothing of the load/unload tabs of magnetic recording head gimbal assemblies, Journal of Tribology, October 2002, Band 124, S. 863-865.
  10. T.A. Mai, G.C. Lim, “Micromelting and its effects on surface topography and properties in laser polishing of stainless steel,” Journal of Laser Applications, 2004.
  11. R. Ostholt, E. Willenborg, K. Wissenbach, “Laser polishing of metallic freeform surfaces,” Proceedings of the Fifth International WLT Conference on Lasers in Manufacturing, Munich, June 2009.

Dr.-Ing. Edgar Willenborg (edgar.willenborg@ilt.fraunhofer.de) is with the Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology, Aachen, Germany, and Dipl.-Ing. Roman Ostholt (roman.ostholt@ilt.fraunhofer) is with RWTH Aachen University - Chair for Laser Technology.

More ILS Issue Articles

More in Surface Treatment